Skip to content

Social networks and popular uprisings: what is the link?

May 12, 2011

By Fiorenzo Conte

In the aftermath of the Arab uprisings, there has been a general excitement about the pivotal role that social networks can play in spurring popular revolts. Social networks have even been credited as the major factor in igniting such uprisings, insofar as they offered a platform for political mobilization. According to Ghonim, marketing manager of Google, who was one of the main organizers of the mobilization in Egypt, Facebook is to be thanked for the freedom achieved in Egypt given that “the revolution started online”.  On the basis of this widely accepted narrative social networks are increasingly feared by authoritarian regime. China makes no exception:

The lesson Beijing has taken from the Middle East uprisings is that the Internet can be the starting point of large-scale popular protests and that it has indeed contributed to the spread of “global values,” such as freedom of expression and human rights. In the minds of the leadership, these factors generate an urgent need to reassert control.

However, if one looks at other countries, the link between social networks and popular uprisings is not as straightforward as it appears to be. In some cases social networks undermine rather than strengthen anti-government protests. For instance, in the Philippines, social networks offered an alternative way to young people to express the discontent. As a result, the appeal to join the anti-government armed struggle has been drastically weakened. In the words of the Chief Negotiator Alex Padilla:

Leftist rebels are being pushed into oblivion by Facebook and the Internet as rebellious youths now vent online instead of taking up arms against the state (..) the Internet had helped steer university students away from the rebels, whom (..) had been reduced to recruiting school dropouts and the unschooled

In other cases, social networks can be utilized by the regimes to single out and crack down on the protesters. In Iran, for example, Facebook posts and tweets were used as evidence against protesters that organized the failed Green Revolution.

Social networks have been heralded as key vehicle for popular mobilization, as protests are gaining ground in the Arab world. Yet, other stories show that the picture is more nuanced and that social network can fragment as much strengthen mass mobilization. Only time will say which of these trends will prevail.

One Comment leave one →
  1. May 13, 2011 9:40 am

    Have you seen this piece from Dan McQuillan?

    He concludes by talking about that world famous picture.

    “The mis-translation of a protester’s sign from Tahrir Square encapsulates the argument about the impact of social media. The photo that shows a middle-aged protestor in Tahrir square holding a handwritten sign in Arabic. The only English word on his sign is ‘FACEBOOK’, in large red letters carfeully highlighted in black. Many western blog and media outlets published versions of this with the slogan translated as ‘Thank you Facebook’. In fact, as I have verified with correspondents in the Egyptian diaspora, the correct translation is ‘Thank you, Egypt’s Facebook youth’. The gulf between these sentiments is huge; the wrong translation elevates the technology, whereas the real one identifies the youth as agents of change.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: